What is Aid?

Aid (noun):

“help, typically of a practical nature.”

— Oxford English Dictionary

Challenging Perspectives:

Take a minute to think about what Aid looks like in your head.

Are you picturing it?

I imagine that you are thinking of an image of poor children in Sub- Saharan Africa being filmed surrounding their village’s new water source, or maybe people in a refugee camp being given blankets, possibly even a food bank in the UK?

These are all examples of Aid, in one way or another, but these images aren’t always the heartwarming stories of lives being changed that we would expect after donating to the causes-

And sometimes it is.

There is a lot of complexity to the morals of giving aid, and is difficult to distinguish what is the best path to take when giving.

6 Types of Aid:

  • 1. Bilateral Aid

    - (also known as Tied Aid) Donor Countries give money for receiving ones to spend on the Donor’s goods and services

  • 2. Multilateral Aid

    Donor Countries send money through a larger international organisation, e.g. World Bank and the United Nations.

  • 3. Emergency Aid

    Resources sent immediately to a country during a disaster, usually earthquakes, tsunamis etc.

  • 4. Long Term Aid

    Continuous support sent to a country to help improve quality of life, e.g. infrastructure grants, education programmes.

  • 5. Debt Abolition

    When a donor country forgives a debt owed to them by a lower income country.

  • 6. Non-Governmental Aid

    Charities providing emergency aid or a good/service specific to the needs of the country.

Where does the UK’s Aid go?

Lazell, M. (2024) The Nationalisation of UK Aid and Development : The End of Aid? /. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland :. .

Lazell, M. (2024) The Nationalisation of UK Aid and Development : The End of Aid? Springer Nature Switzerland. Fig 5.2

UK Government (2022) Statistics on International Development: Final UK Aid Spend 2022. Figure 19

ODA= Official Development Assistance

DAC= Development Assistance Committee

The UK’s extensive Aid budget is not evenly dispersed in its disbursement, consistently favouring East Africa and South and Central Asia to send mostly multilateral aid to.

Post Covid-19 pandemic the budget has decreased significantly going from 0.7% of the Gross National Income to 0.5%. It isn’t expected to rise again until the financial pressures felt across the UK have lifted significantly.

The countries most affected by this are in West Africa (Congo’s Aid decreased 99% in the 2021-22 budget) and Western Asia (Pakistan faced a 73% decrease in UK funding, a loss of £344 Million).

Here are some current examples:

The Dark Side of Aid.

The Dark Side of Aid.

Aid seems like the most selfless thing people can do, and in a lot of cases, thats where its roots lie.

Oxfam, one of the largest humanitarian aid charities in the UK was formed by a group of people wanting to help Grecian people cope with famine after World War 2. Noble intentions, positive outcomes. As they continued to expand, it seemed that the good work was endless, but so are the appeals.

There is a certain amount of trust placed in the hands of any NGO (non government organisation) by the public to delegate the resources into the right places and help as much as possible. The ineffectiveness of some Aid, governmental or otherwise may be disheartening to many and can cause problems in the dispersion.

The problem is when a charity prioritises creating demand for donations over accurately representing the realities of the people who, in our eyes, need aid. When appealing becomes about manipulation of peoples empathy instead of allowing the truth to be enough for people to help.

Think of these pictures and videos, calling for donations, appealing to our humanity: starving children, disease ridden water sources, women scavenging a landfill.

These pictures, they create a mental image of people in the “undeveloped world” people who live primitive and limited lives and will only be saved by your money and support. This creates an air of “us” and “them” which is uncomfortable to investigate. Looking at other countries situations from a place of wealth and pitying them for not living like us.

Historically this is interesting because the stunted economic development shown can often be attributed to colonialism, which, needless to say the UK was more than complicit in. So to turn on our heels and insert into the rebuilding by demanding donations from the people most powerless to stop it happening in the first place feels backhanded at best.

The marketing of NGOs to garner support reflects this othering mindset, by orchestrating the most emotive images and placing statistics and testimonials overlaying them is an effective way to gain attention from the public. By reinforcing these ideas, are we perpetuating a stereotype in the interest of “selling sadness” to donors?

Even if this tactic is in the interest of helping people, where is the line of morality in manipulating situations to gain the means to do so.